Posted 3 years ago
As the world’s most popular behavioral assessment, DISC offers a simple solution with profound results. Learn how to identify the behavioral styles of others and adapt your communication to increase sales, assemble teams, target new hires, develop “rockstar” leaders, and more.
Why choose DISC over the any of the numerous other assessments that are available?
This DISC behavioral assessment measures and provides insight into four primary behavioral tendencies and emotions. It explores how these come together in a personal blend of style to create our DISC style.
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientiousness – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Dominance Styles often prefer strong, directive management
and operational tendencies and work quickly and impressively by themselves.
They try to shape their environments to overcome obstacles en route to their
accomplishments. They demand maximum freedom to manage themselves and others,
using their leadership skills to become winners. Additionally, Dominance Styles
often have good directive and delegation skills. This matches their motivating
need to have control over things. If they could delegate their exercise
regimens or visits to the dentist’s office, they probably would.
These assertive types tend to appear cool, independent, and competitive. They
opt for measurable results, including their personal worth, determined by
individual track records. Of all the behavioral types, they like and initiate
change the most. Some symbolize this personality type with a lion – a leader,
an authority. At the least, they may have the inner desire to be #1, the star,
or the chief.
Influence – High “I” Style
The Influence Style’s primary strengths are their enthusiasm, persuasiveness, and friendliness. They are idea people who can get others caught up in their dreams. With great persuasion, they influence others and shape their environments by building alliances to accomplish results. Then they seek nods and comments of approval and recognition for those results. If compliments don’t come, Influence Styles may invent their own. “Well, Harry, I just feel like patting myself on the back today for a job well done!” They are stimulating, talkative, and communicative. Often, this style is associated with a dolphin -playful, sociable, and talkative.
Steadiness – High “S” Style
An American icon, Mr. Rogers, was a classic example of a low-keyed, sincere, Steadiness Style. He visited millions of homes each day via TV for decades, with the same routine and endearing, heartfelt connection with his viewers. People still reminisce about his soothing voice and comforting delivery. His manner had a unique way of adding a sense of stability, calmness, and reassurance to everyone, regardless of age.
Like Mr. Rogers, other Steadiness Styles also naturally are easy to get along with, preferring stable relationships that don’t jeopardize anyone, especially themselves. The Steadiness Style may be represented by the koala with its accompanying slower, Steadiness pace, relaxed disposition, and appearance of approachability and warmth. These styles tend to plan diligently and follow through completely, helping them to routinely plug along with predictability and avoid surprises.
Conscientiousness – High “C” Style
Conscientiousness Style’s strengths include accuracy, dependability, independence, clarification, follow-through, and organization. They often focus on expectations (e.g., policies, processes, and procedures) and outcomes. They want to know how things work so they can evaluate how correctly and efficiently they function. Pictured as a fox, the Conscientiousness Style can be guarded, resourceful, and careful. Because they need to be right, they prefer checking processes themselves to be sure things are accurate and precise.
All styles have many powerful and positive characteristics, but all styles have traits that are not as positive and can create limitations to effectiveness and our relationships.
Dominance – High “D” Style
Some Dominance Style traits that may have an adverse effect include stubbornness, impatience, and lack of compassion. Naturally preferring to take control of others, they may have a low tolerance for the feelings, attitudes, and “inadequacies” of co-workers, subordinates, friends, families, and romantic interests.
Influence – High “I” Style
The I style’s natural weaknesses are too much involvement, impatience, being alone, and short attention spans which may cause them to become easily bored. When a little data comes in, Influence Styles tend to make sweeping generalizations. They may not check everything out, assuming someone else will do it or procrastinating because redoing something just isn’t exciting enough. When Influence Styles feel they don’t have enough stimulation and involvement, they may lose interest and look for something new again… and again… and again. When taken to an extreme, their behaviors can be seen as superficial, haphazard, erratic, and overly emotional.
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Steadiness styles have their own type of unique difficulties with speaking up, seeming to go along with others or any conditions, while inwardly, they may or may not agree. More assertive types might take advantage of this Steadiness style’s tendency to give in and avoid confrontation. Additionally, the Steadiness Style’s reluctance to express themselves can result in hurt feelings. But if they don’t express their feelings, others may never know. Their lack of assertiveness and expression can take a toll on this type’s health and well-being.
Conscientiousness – High “C” Style
The C style may suffer from a lack of moving forward and making decisions. A strong tendency toward perfectionism, when taken to an extreme, can result in “analysis paralysis,” delaying their ability to act quickly. These overly cautious traits may result in worry that the process isn’t progressing correctly or that the decision isn’t the right one, which further promotes their tendency to behave in a more critical, detached way.
Dominance – High “D” Style
Dominance Styles, driven by the inner need to lead and be in control, take charge of people and situations so they can reach their goals. Since their key need is achieving, they seek no-nonsense, bottom-line results. Their motto is: “Lead, follow, or get out of the way.” They want to win, so they may challenge people or rules. Similarly, the Dominance Styles also accept challenges, take authority, and go headfirst into solving problems.
Influence – High “I” Style
The “I” Style wants your admiration and thrives on acknowledgment, compliments, and applause. “It’s not just whether you win or lose… it’s how you look when you play the game.” Admiration and acceptance typically mean more to this type than to any other. If you don’t talk about them, they may spend considerable time talking about their favorite subject – themselves – to gain acceptance.
Steadiness – High “S” Style
The Steadiness Styles strive for security. Their goal is to maintain the stability they prefer in a constant, predictable environment. To them, while the unknown may be an intriguing concept, they prefer to stick with what they already know and have experienced. Risk is a nerve-wracking word to the Steadiness Style. They favor more measured actions, like keeping things as they have been and are, even if the present situation happens to be unpleasant.
Conscientious – High “C” Style
The Conscientiousness Styles concern themselves more with precise content than with congratulations. They prefer involvement with the performance of products and services under specific, and preferably controlled, conditions so the process and the results can be perfect. Since their primary concern is accuracy, human emotions may take a back seat with this type. After all, emotions are subjective and tend to distort objectivity.
Dominance – High “D” Style
Closely related to the Dominance Styles’ goals are their fears: falling into a routine, being taken advantage of or losing control, and looking “soft.” They may go to extremes to prevent those fears from materializing. They may act impatiently in ways others may not agree with, but they make things happen with great urgency.
Influence – High “I” Style
An Influence Style’s biggest fear is social rejection and lack of acceptance – whether from appearing uninvolved, unattractive, unsuccessful, or unacceptable to others. These frightening forms of personal denial threaten the Influence Style’s core need for approval and acknowledgment. Consequently, they may go to extremes to avoid embarrassment, lack of inclusion, or loss of social recognition and admiration.
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Related to the Steadiness Style’s goal of keeping things predictable and stable is an accompanying fear of sudden change and disorganization. Consequently, any disruption in their routine patterns can cause distress in the Steadiness Style. Fearing sudden changes, they are naturally concerned with what may happen as a result of being unprepared. A general worry is that the unknown may be even more unpleasant than the present. They need to think and plan for changes. Finding elements of consistency within those changes can help minimize their stress and identify specific assurances required to cope with such demands with grace and constancy.
Conscientiousness – High “C” Style
The Conscientiousness Style’s biggest fears stem from a desire for perfection and accuracy. The C style does not want to do anything or get anything wrong. Often responsible for subjectivity and errors, these thinkers fear uncontrolled emotions and irrational acts (in self and others) that relate to challenging their goals. This type strives to avoid mistakes at all costs.
Dominance – High “D” Style
AT THE OFFICE
When entering a Dominance Style’s office, the overall tone suggests authority and control. Their desks may be covered with projects and papers, stacked in neat piles. Both in- and out-baskets typically bulge with busywork. They tend to surround themselves with trophies, awards, and other evidence of personal achievement. Virtually everything about the place suggests hustle, bustle, formality, and power. This type often favors a large chair behind a massive authority structure, like a power desk. Besides non-verbally announcing, “I’m important,” the desk separates them from others, literally keeping them at a distance.
The walls may include diplomas, commendations, and other evidence of success. One wall may be covered with a large planning sheet or calendar. If Dominance Styles have family photos, they may hang behind them or someplace where they don’t readily see them. To this type, their offices are places of business, and the fewer distractions they have, the better.
HUSTLE, BUSTLE, AND BUSYWORK
Dominance Styles like constant activity, so you’ll seldom catch them idle. Between existing tasks, they are likely to pick up new ones. They perk up when competing and appear to thrive with a pressure cooker schedule. They often squeeze you onto their calendars and let you know that their time is limited, either by telling you outright or by showing you. Looking at a watch or clock, they frequently shift their gaze elsewhere, or make and take phone calls while you sit in their office.
They walk fast in pursuit of a tangible goal, so Dominance Styles may not notice people around them or may just hurriedly grunt something to acknowledge them. They often act both brisk and brusque without realizing it. When under stress, impatience emerges and they may push others aside to reach their goal – completing a report, getting served first, or running out the door to make an appointment. When pressure intensifies, Dominance Styles often rise to the occasion. Under time constraints, they may concede to impatience and rely on educated guesses or their hunches. The urgency of resolution is more important than accuracy.
POWER SYMBOLS
Dominance Styles tend to dress comfortably but in a way that shows their position or influence. They focus primarily on work results, so wardrobe tends to play a secondary role. They may be candidates for a time-saving personal shopper or tailor who can choose or measure outfits for them in the privacy of their own offices. Dominance Styles gravitate toward authority symbols, so they may wear navy blue or charcoal gray power suits.
Dominance Styles may like to let people know they’ve made it without having to tell anyone about it, so they often prefer possessions that emit success and authority messages – like a black or steel gray Mercedes or BMW. Someone once suggested that they’d buy a tank if they could.
Influence – High “I” Style
AT THE OFFICE
When you enter the working area of an Influence Style, you may recognize it immediately. High Influence Styles may have a desk covered with paperwork, sometimes trailing it along the floor, too. They react to visual stimuli, so they like to have everything where they can see it. Consequently, their desks often look cluttered and disorganized. If anyone comments, “How do you find anything?” they like to say that they’re organized in their own way.
An Influence Style’s walls may showcase prestigious awards. They may be broad, liberal arts degrees, motivational or upbeat slogans, generalized personal comments, or stimulating posters. You may see notes posted and taped all over the place with little apparent forethought, rhyme, or reason. The overall decor reflects an open, airy, lively atmosphere that often reveals the personality of its occupant. Likewise, the furniture arrangement tends to indicate warmth, openness, and interaction. An Influence Style seldom sits behind a desk and talks. Instead, they often opt for comfortable, accessible seating, enabling getting to know people better. They prefer to sit next to others at a table or on a couch to see and hear better and get a feel for how people respond. This style talks a lot and shows emotion with both body language and speech.
FEELINGS TAKE PRIORITY
Influence Styles have a natural preference for talking and listening in feeling terms. Unconsciously, they may become uncomfortable when talking to a person who, instead, uses thinking words. (The opposite also is true). Statements that highlight emotions like, “I feel that we should have been consulted about moving our office,” or, “I feel good about what we’ve accomplished today,” tend to put this people-oriented type more at ease.
THEY LIKE GLITZ AND PIZZAZZ!
The way Influence Styles dress often relates to their need for recognition. Since they like others to notice them, they may dress in the latest style or something particularly eye-catching (sparkles!). The “look at me” Influence Styles like bright colors and unusual clothes that prompt others to compliment them. Many Influence Styles even prefer negative comments to none at all, getting the attention that is craved.
In an informal poll taken by Dr. Tony at his many seminars, red ranks number one with Influence Styles as their color choice for clothes or a sports car or convertible. They like glamour, flash, and excitement, and their purchases often express their preferences. Musical choices include fun, energizing songs that make people want to move.
Steadiness – High “S” Style
OFFICE MEMORABILIA
When you enter a Steadiness Style’s office, you’ll find conservatively framed
personal slogans, group photos, serene landscapes and posters, and other
personal items. Since they seek close relationships, there will likely be
telltale family pictures and mementos, usually turned so they can view them
from their desk chair. They often favor nostalgic memories of grounding experiences
and relationships in an increasingly busy, impersonal, and high-tech world.
These remembrances of a pleasant, uncomplicated past allow them to transform
their offices into an environment of friendly warmth. They prefer to arrange
seating in a side-by-side, more congenial, cooperative manner. No big power
desks for them! If they do have one, though, they’ll typically come out from
behind it to interact, opting for a more personal touch.
SERVICE CERTIFICATES
Their educational background often includes more specialized areas of attention
and interest within their professions. You may also see certificates
recognizing volunteer hours for various hands-on activities in their community.
While other behavioral types may contribute in other ways, such as gifts or
money, Steadiness Styles typically enjoy giving their time for causes about
which they feel strongly. Besides the possibility of meeting more potential
friends, this also helps satisfy their need to see for themselves: (1) what’s
going on, (2) where they fit into the group effort, and (3) how they can contribute
and support meaningful results.
STEADINESS STYLES ARE NATURAL LISTENERS
You can recognize Steadiness Styles by their natural listening patterns and
slower, lower-key delivery in conversation. They are unlikely to interject and
are much more likely to allow the conversation to pace itself naturally. Their
questions may focus on concrete topics and experiences and will likely be comprehensive,
deep, and thoughtful. They walk casually with a soft approachability, acknowledging
others and sometimes getting sidetracked by chance encounters that present an
opportunity to engage with others.
NOTHING TOO LOUD FOR THEM
Steadiness Styles dislike calling attention to themselves, so they tend to wear
subdued colors and conservatively cut clothing, favoring conventional styles
that don’t stand out too much. Their cars also reveal these preferences. They
often like beige or light blue station wagons or vans, factory recommended
tires, and in the best of all worlds – no horn. To Steadiness Styles, using a
horn is like yelling at somebody. They also prefer their environments to be
relaxing and comfortable, often with soft music, specialty lighting that is not
too harsh, and an open-door that invites others into their space.
Conscientiousness – High “C” Style
AT THE OFFICE
Conscientiousness Styles often carry their organizational tendencies into their work environments. Visible clues that you are working with a C style include neat, highly organized desks with cleared tops so they can work unimpeded by clutter – clean and professional with everything in the appropriate place. Charts, graphs, exhibits, models, credentials, and job-related pictures are often placed neatly on their office walls or shelves. Conscientiousness Styles favor functional decor that will enable them to work more efficiently. They tend to keep most objects within reach, readily available when needed. Where appropriate, you may notice state-of-the-art technology to further enhance efficiency.
CONSCIENTIOUSNESS STYLES ASK PERTINENT QUESTIONS
People of few words, Conscientiousness Styles tend to ask pertinent questions instead of making statements. They typically speak more carefully and with less expression than the other types. They are likely to be slow to speak until they are confident that what they are sharing is completely accurate as well. Reluctant to reveal personal feelings, they often use thinking words (like the Dominance Style), as opposed to feeling words. “From what I’ve read, I think Product X may be better for our situation than Product Y because of its superior filtration system,” or, “I think that Jones is overreacting in this matter.”
FORMALITY IS MORE COMFORTABLE
Conscientiousness Styles are non-contact people who prefer the distance formality provides. This preference is reflected in the functional, but uninviting, arrangement of their desks and chairs, usually with the desks physically separating you and them. They generally are not fond of huggers and touchers and prefer a cool handshake or a brief phone call. When Conscientiousness Styles walk, they usually move slowly and methodically toward a known destination.
NOTICEABLY UNDERSTATED
Conscientiousness Styles tend to wear more conservative clothes, but with unique, often perfectly matched accessories. While the Influence Style may draw attention to herself with glitz and glitter, Conscientiousness Styles usually prefer a more understated, faultlessly groomed look, often in classic, muted tones.
They like expressions of individuality and creativity but within specific guidelines. Male Conscientiousness Styles with beards seem to prefer short, well-manicured ones. Hairstyles are likely to be neat and symmetrical. Since they may prefer exploring life’s complexities, Conscientiousness Styles may enjoy the intricacies of a specific kind of music or individual musical piece, whether jazz, classical, rock, etc. You may spot them driving well-built, practical cars that perform as expected and dependably, often in more conservative, understated, but less common colors.
Dominance – High “D” Style
When speaking on the phone to a Dominance Style, treat her the same way as an in-person contact. Think of the ABC’s: Keep it abridged, brief, and concise. Prepare your delivery with the bottom line in mind: “The trend in your industry is toward computer-generated graphics. The research we’ve conducted with other typesetters in your area indicates increased profits of 20 to 30% over two years. I’d like to meet with you for 10 minutes to show you the numbers and see if this concept interests you.”
THEY WASTE NO TIME
It’s not unusual for a Dominance Style to call someone and, without saying
hello, launch right into the conversation. “You’ve got to be kidding; the
shipment delay will kill us . . . by the way, this is Jack.” When other
people can’t keep up with them, or misread their cues and language, they may
view them as incompetent.
On the telephone, it’s helpful to determine whether the person sends power signals. Dominance Styles want to pick the time and place to meet. They often speak in a sort of shorthand – concisely and pointedly, sometimes with few words – and sound cool, confident, and demanding. When Dominance Style Dennis phones, he says: “Janice? Dennis. Tony there?” Talking to him may feel like speaking to a machine or voice recognition system. The D style raises the concept of “brief and to-the-point” to another level. As commanding speakers who tend not to listen to others, they naturally want to direct the conversation toward their goals. Under stress, they can become defensive and aggressive, attacking others personally to show who’s in control. They dislike using touchy-feely, emotional terms, and prefer sensible thinking terminology. “I think we’ll implement this plan tomorrow,” or, “I think this discussion is over.”
Influence – High “I” Style
“What’s up?” or “What’s happening?” are the usual Influence Style opening lines. They are sometimes so animated that their gestures can be transmitted via the phone lines by their varied, emotional vocal inflections/intonations and their colorful choice of words that may tend toward exaggeration: “Really? That’s fantastic!” or “You have to be kidding me!” The phone can be a favorite toy that enables them to both prolong conversations and recharge themselves, especially when no one else is physically around. “I just called because I’m bored.” You may also detect background noise when you speak to individuals of this style. They sometimes put on the TV or radio just for the sound, visual stimulation, and activity. On the phone, Influence Styles speak rapidly and emotively. They are known to use “feeling” terms, rather than “thinking” terms like, “I feel that if we go through with this plan, the community will resent us as anti-environmentalists,” or, “I feel that I’ve contributed enough to this organization over the years to allow me to talk about this.”
SAY IT WITH FEELING
Typically, you’ll notice a wide range of vocal inflection and intonation and a
tendency to want to know your reaction. The I style will ask, “Do you feel
that way, too?” They liven up conversations with personal anecdotes and
may keep you on the phone longer than you had anticipated. If you need to detach
yourself from an extended monologue, try something like, “Well, Don, it’s
been great talking with you. I’m really looking forward to our appointment on
Monday!” If you say it with feeling, the Influence Style may already
eagerly anticipate your meeting.
Steadiness – High “S” Style
“How are you?” or “I’m glad to hear from you again,” are typical Steadiness Style greetings. Like holiday ads from your favorite companies, their warmth can seem to transcend the limitations of the phone lines. Although they prefer more personal interactions with people, they will also settle for indirect contact – especially if the person is pleasant and non-threatening. They project this people-orientation easily, even by phone, and like to build a personal, first-name relationship with callers. Even if they don’t know you, they may say, ” Just call me Alice.” They may project a desire to know you personally or provide you with excellent service. They communicate with even vocal intonations to convey friendliness, comfort, and a sense of relaxation. Steadiness Styles tend to be naturals at listening to others’ ideas and feelings, whether on the phone or in person. They tend to be interested in the detailed, point-by-point description of what you did yesterday or the sequential pattern of how to complete a particular task. You’re probably talking to a high Steadiness Style if you notice warmth and genuine conversation, slower than average speech patterns, more moments of listening than of speaking, and references to actual, real-life experiences regarding either products or mutual acquaintances.
“I’LL CHECK ON THAT FOR YOU”
Steadiness Styles tend to express themselves in a somewhat tentative manner in
both their face-to-face and telephone conversations. Even when confident with
the answer, they will often attempt to get other perspectives before making a
final decision. You’ll hear things like, “I’ll need to consult Mrs. Adams
before I can make that decision,” or, “I’m not sure we can do that,
but I’ll get back to you as soon as I find out.” As in other aspects of
their lives, they often defer to the more human, proven way things have always
been done. They typically feel more comfortable making decisions based on
conferring with others rather than by themselves. “What do you
think?”, “How do you feel?”, and “What do you
recommend?” are all common questions this style will likely ask.
Conscientiousness – High “C” Style
“Good morning, Mr. Loomis. This is Jonathan Williams. You asked me to call back on Monday.” Formal greetings are one tip-off that you may be dealing with a Conscientiousness Style. Time-conscious individuals of this type often get to a task exactly when they say they will. Monday morning it is! In this example, the Conscientiousness Style also calls himself Jonathan, not Jon. Many people with this style call themselves by their given names, not by nicknames. It’s Elizabeth, Rebecca, Donald, and Peter, not Beth, Becca, Don, or Pete. Of course, there are exceptions; Jon may prove to be an effective and logical alternative for some Conscientiousness Styles, but this type seems less likely to tolerate what they perceive as “cute” nicknames, such as Jonny, Donny, or Becky. Remember, formality is more in alignment with this style.
“MAY I SPEAK WITH MR. HOLMES OR DR. BROTHERS?”
High C styles prefer brief, to-the-point telephone calls. Although they may not
tell you, call them Mister or Ms. or Doctor, whatever their title happens to be,
to build quick rapport. Conscientiousness Styles sometimes view jumping into a
first-name basis as an invasion of privacy, so they deal with others more
formally. If you think you’re talking to Sherlock Holmes or Bill Gates, chances
are you’ve contacted a Conscientiousness Style. They typically hold their
ground in stressful situations when they can maintain their position with
concrete facts or evidence-based questions. They do this quietly and
independently, by first avoiding others. Then they take on the problem in an
orderly way, backed by research and relevant details.
“NEED TO KNOW” BASIS
They’re inclined to talk in structured, careful speech patterns, almost
weighing their words as they say them. They tend to ask relevant questions and
talk in a quiet, observant, and cautious way. Additionally, they may not
volunteer much about their personal lives beyond the equivalent of name, rank,
and serial number like, “I’m married with two children. We live in New
York.” They prefer to keep the relationship formal, yet pleasant and
business-like. Less can be more to a Conscientiousness Style – less
conversation, less self-disclosure, and less verbal communication equal more
comfort zone. Longer than average silences, especially when asked more private
questions, may signal annoyance or reluctance. When this occurs, ask, “Am
I getting too personal?” or “If I’m asking uncomfortable questions,
could you let me know?” They may relax more if they think they have an
out. Careful and correct, Conscientiousness Styles tend to express themselves
in a somewhat tentative manner. “I’ll check on that and let you know
tomorrow.” They may want to provide you with information so you can form
your own conclusions. “I have a copy of the Governor’s report in my files.
If I send it to you, perhaps you can find what you’re looking for.” Both of
these approaches satisfy the Conscientiousness Styles’ need for caution and
correctness. They may not want to get misquoted or, possibly, involved in the
first place.
Dominance – High “D” Style
EMAILS ARE BRIEF AND TO THE POINT
An email from a Dominance Style tends to be brief, dynamic, and to the point.
They may mention highlights of conversations or materials, but they don’t
belabor them. They may give specifics for your follow-through or raise
questions they want answers to now. “The Mulvaney account needs to be
reworked. I hear he’s got a new partner and a different address. Track him down
and get the data we need so we can let him know that we’ve studied his account
and we know our stuff.”
Even notes and cards take on abbreviated forms and may show little or no indication of feelings. “Todd, hope you’re doing well. I’m working hard.” It is common for Dominance Style to sign personal birthday and Christmas cards with no closing, not even “Sincerely,” but with just their names. Dominance Styles are task-focused, and perhaps in their efforts to get as many things accomplished as possible, tend to opt for brevity. Terms of endearment are rarely necessary.
Influence – High “I” Style
Emails, too, can reveal the Influence Style behind the correspondence. Often, this type overuses exclamation points, underlining, and bold highlighting. You can almost hear her emphasizing those picturesque adjectives and adverbs. Just as the Influence Style tends to speak in a stimulating, energetic way, so does she write. She may also throw in an image-provoking personal anecdote or reference to some mutually satisfying experience. “I’ll never forget our adventure on the freeway en route to Los Angeles – in rush hour, of course!” When she’s finished a letter or note, she may add a postscript (P.S.), a P.P.S., or even a P.P.P.S. It is highly likely you’ll see symbols and emoticons used, peppered throughout the narrative to lighten the language.
Remember, these tendencies may not as readily reveal themselves if the Influence Style has learned to tone down her natural flair while conducting business. And there’s always a possibility that an assistant cleans up her copy before sending it out, especially if the assistant is a more reserved, less animated behavioral type.
Steadiness – High “S” Style
In written correspondence, Steadiness Styles may send notes just to keep in touch or to let you know they’re thinking of you. Of the four personality types, this one is likely to send thank you notes for almost anything – inviting them to a party, driving them to the dry cleaners, or saving coupons for them. They may even send a thank you note to acknowledge your thank you note. Again, they are likely to organize their correspondence, writing as they do their other to do task lists – probably in sequential in-out order. Since they tend to write in a slower, more methodically paced manner, their work tends to follow a systematic outline pattern. You’ll likely always see the start of the message addressing how the other party is doing, “I hope this message finds you well and healthy.” There is as great a likelihood that they’ll end the message with an offer of support or provide an opportunity to connect, should it be helpful.
Conscientiousness – High “C” Style
Conscientiousness Styles typically send emails to clarify or
explain. Consequently, the emails may become rather long and filled with data,
and unlikely to have very much personal or emotional flair to the message.
“I was struck by the similarities between the Noonan and Kilgary
lawsuits.” But they may also be somewhat reserved or vague. “I’m
researching a company’s file now that I can’t talk about.” Or the email
may be on the short side with enclosures, citations, or references to specific
information. Whether they prefer the long or short form, they usually
concentrate on processing data. They like to cover their bases, so they are
neither misinterpreted, incomplete, nor incorrect.
Like Dominance Styles, in the interest of time, they may sign personal cards
with just their names or with individual mottos, like “In the spirit of
growth, Jonathan Williams.” Even if you know them well, this type may
include their surnames so there’s no mistaking who sent this card.
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientiousness – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Leaving Voicemails for Dominant Styles:
Sample e-mail to a Dominant Style:
Robert,
I know you’re constantly looking for ways to increase efficiencies, leverage technology to your advantage, and gain a competitive advantage over your competition.
Click here to read a hard-hitting article that teaches how to leverage high-tech to create high-touch client relationships.
Success all ways,
Scott Zimmerman
The Cyrano Group
Influence – High “I” Style
Leaving Voicemails for Influence Styles:
Sample e-mail to an Influence Style:
Dear Bob,
I know you’re big into sending out info that increases your top-of-mind awareness with your clients, prospects and colleagues. That’s what makes you so successful!
Check out this cool article that teaches how to leverage high-tech to stay in meaningful contact with hundreds of people.
Let me know what you think!
Best,
Scott
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Sample e-mail to a Steady Style:
Dear Robert,
I know you care deeply about keeping your clients, helping others and staying in contact with all your prospects.
I just found this article that teaches how to leverage high-tech to create high-touch client relationships and I wanted you to have the information, too.
Feel free to call me if you want to DISCuss this personally.
Warmly,
Scott
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Leaving Voicemails for Conscientious Styles:
Sample e-mail to a Conscientious Style:
Robert,
I just read a very informative article about how smart salespeople are systematizing every aspect of their client/prospect communication activities.
You may click here to read an article that teaches how to leverage high-tech to automate high-touch campaigns.
Toward your marketing success,
Scott Zimmerman
Managing Partner of TheCyranoGroup.com
Each style communicates in ways so different that it’s no wonder misunderstandings occur.
Dominance – High “D” Style
Dominant Styles tend to communicate with short, task-oriented comments, particularly at the start of a meeting when they like to assume control and set the meeting in motion. More than the other styles, they’re concerned about having a clear agenda and setting the tone. They like to keep the discussion on track and on time.
They usually talk most at the beginning and end of meetings, perhaps losing interest in the middle. They also may jump into a discussion, bringing lots of energy and a sense of urgency. Then they may pull back, often in frustration with the failure to make rapid, tangible progress. Before long, they begin to call attention to how much time’s gone by. Soon, they’re pressing for closure and for concrete decisions.
Influence – High “I” Style
Influence Styles, by contrast, communicate more frequently and more evenly throughout a meeting. Their comments are more likely to include jokes and to cover a range of topics so wide that the Influence Style may appear to be hopping all over the place.
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Steady Styles seem generally interested in discussions throughout the whole meeting. They may ask many questions, trying to understand others’ points of view or what follow-through will be expected. They naturally act as synthesizers, go-betweens, or translators, by saying things like, “Now, if I understand what Jane and Tom meant, it’s that the next step is to….” or “To get back to Samantha’s comment, it seems that her idea dovetails nicely with what Bob mentioned a few minutes ago.”
Conscientious – High “C” Style
On the other hand, Conscientious Styles usually just quietly observe until they fully grasp an issue and have figured out in some detail what they want to say and if they’ll feel comfortable saying it. They often begin by asking a few, well-chosen questions. Then, if the climate seems receptive, they’ll build up to a longer statement on what they believe is the answer.
The different styles often have different goals in mind. Even the number of objectives can differ.
Dominance – High “D” Style
Dominant Styles prefer to focus on one specific goal. Ideally, it involves an action that’s also efficient, productive, and cheap.
Influence – High “I” Style
Influence Styles, by contrast, may have many loosely defined objectives and those may change in the course of the process. If there’s a consistent theme to the Influence Styles’ goal-setting, it’s getting the job done by being nimble, by changing as much or as often as needed.
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Steady Styles tend to favor multiple goals. If they must choose just one, it’d be one that opens opportunities for themselves and others to work well together. So, for example, they might favor dividing the problem into parts and then assigning sub-groups to handle each part.
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Quite to the contrary, Conscientious Styles, like Dominant Styles, strongly prefer a single goal for the group. Conscientious Styles especially like goals that put the greatest emphasis on accuracy or quality – say, deciding to produce the best item, rather than one of lesser quality which might be made quicker or more cheaply. Conscientious Styles also favor goals that promote the growth of something – size, profit, efficiency, customer satisfaction, or anything that can be reflected in an upward trend line.
The different styles try to sway, or influence, the group in different ways. This can become critical because every group at an early stage wrestles with the issue of who’s going to wield power.
Dominance – High “D” Style
Dominant Styles like to influence others by structuring agendas, tasks, and assignments and, if relevant, use their formal position as leverage (“As general manager for the past 18 years, I’ve seen these situations develop, and I think….”)
Influence – High “I” Style
Influence Styles are more inclined to use flattery or compliments to win over the group and get its members to feel good as a team. They’ll often use humor to defuse tension or conflict. They try to avoid a hard line that’ll lose them acceptance or recognition by the group.
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Steady Styles, whether they’re anointed leaders or not, often take on the role of keeping the process moving along. They’ll elaborate on what others say and encourage everyone to have their say. They seek to exert influence indirectly by keeping things mellow and moving.
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Information and logic are the tools of Conscientious Styles. They like to furnish information that, directly or indirectly, suggests their expertise and experience. (“Remember, I was one of those who came up with the original plan. The rationale at that time was clear, and I think what we want to do here is….”) They’re the most likely to focus on the “rightness,” or logic, of a solution, rather than spend a lot of time debating who’s personally helped or hindered by it.
Working in a group, by definition, means involving others. But the four styles vary in why and how enthusiastically they embrace others.
Dominance – High “D” Style
Generally, groups put together by Dominant Styles will be smaller and have shorter meetings than those set up by people with other styles. Often, the Dominant Style will want the group to make some key decisions on key issues, and then delegate the rest of the work to individuals or subcommittees.
Influence – High “I” Style
Influence Styles are more inclined to favor groups for groups’ sake. They like others to be involved in the give-and-take. Not everyone who’s put on a committee by an Influence Style will have a logical role there but, in the Influence Styles’s mind, that person is further seasoning for the soup, if not necessarily a main ingredient.
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Steady Styles also are innately attracted to groups. However, instead of using meetings for presentation of reports, they prefer to work toward consensus as they collect information from many sources.
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Conscientious Styles, too, involve others in groups to get information from a wide variety of sources. However, Conscientious Styles are generally less comfortable operating in groups. So they prefer to have much of the group work done behind the scenes by sub-groups or individuals. The Conscientious Style especially likes to be the only one who knows how all the parts of the group’s task puzzle fit together.
The four styles differ in their approach to group work because they tend to make decisions differently.
Dominance – High “D” Style
In a meeting run by Dominant Styles, decisions are more likely to be made unilaterally by the Dominant Styles, or he or she will call for a vote. Dominant Styles like voting because it’s clean, quick, and decisive. It keeps debating to a minimum. Also, it’s harder to argue that a vote is unfair and closure is clearly attained. Next topic!
A problem with voting – though the Dominant Styles rarely see it as a problem – is that there are winners and losers.
Influence – High “I” Style
Influence Styles, being more people-oriented, try to work out compromises that reduce resentment and smooth over differences. Influence Styles want to downplay group divisions. So they’re not big on voting.
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Steady Styles also prefer decisions by consensus. They’d like to see the majority of the group be on the bus. So actions tend to be worked and reworked until almost all are in agreement.
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Conscientious Styles crave “rational” decisions. Optimally, the decision won’t be made as much as it will be dictated by the facts and logic of the situation, including the key players required to make it work. Conscientious Styles like to list pros and cons of issues – sometimes even weighing the options numerically – to reach the “correct” decision. The process, they believe, will make obvious the best course of action.
Dominance – High “D” Style
How should you treat Dominant Styles? Dominant Styles are very time-sensitive, so never waste their time. Be organized and prepared to work quickly. Get to the point and give them bottom-line information and options, with probabilities of success, if relevant. Give them written details to read at their leisure.
Dominant Styles are goal-oriented, so appeal to their sense of accomplishment. Stroke their egos by recognizing their ideas, and subtly reassure them of their power and prestige. Let Dominant Styles call the shots. If you disagree, argue with facts rather than feelings. When in groups, allow them to have their say because they are not the type who will take a back-seat to others.
With Dominant Styles, in general, be efficient and competent.
Influence – High “I” Style
How should you treat Influence Styles? Influence Styles thrive on personal recognition, so pour it on when there is a reason. Support their ideas, goals, opinions, and dreams. Try not to argue with their pie-in-the-sky visions, get excited about them.
Influence Styles are social-butterflies, so be ready to flutter around with them. A strong presence, stimulating and entertaining conversation, jokes, and liveliness will win them over. They are people-oriented, so give them time to socialize. Avoid rushing into tasks.
Influence Styles are less reliable than others, so get all details and commitments in writing. Be clear and direct in your expectations of them. Give them incentives for performance, when possible, and check on them periodically to make sure they are on track.
With Influence Styles, in general, be interested in them.
Steadiness – High “S” Style
How should you treat Steady Styles? They want warm and fuzzy relationships. You have to earn their trust before they will let you in. Support their feelings and show interest in every facet of their lives. Take things slow; they are relationship-oriented, but slow-paced. You should talk in terms of feelings, not facts, which is the opposite of your strategy for Thinkers.
Steady Styles don’t want to ruffle feathers, so assure them that everyone around them will approve of their actions or decisions. Give them time to solicit the opinions of others. Never back a Relater into a corner. It is far more effective to apply warmth to get this chicken out of its egg than to crack the shell with a hammer.
With Steady Styles, in general, be non-threatening and sincere.
Conscientious – High “C” Style
How should you adapt to Conscientious Styles? Conscientious Styles are time-disciplined, so be sensitive to their time. They need details, so give them data. They are task-oriented, so don’t expect to become their friend before doing business or working with them. That may develop later, but – unlike Influence Styles – it is not a prerequisite for Conscientious Styles.
Support Conscientious Styles in their organized, thoughtful approach to problems and tasks. Be systematic, logical, well-prepared, and exact with them. Give them time to make decisions and work on their own. In workgroups, do not expect them to be leaders or outspoken contributors, but you can rely on them to conduct research, crunch numbers, and develop methods for the group.
Conscientious Styles like to be complimented on their brain-power, so recognize their contributions with the appropriate terms (efficiency, etc.). If appropriate, set guidelines and exact due dates for Conscientious Styles. Allow them to talk in detail, as they are prone to do. If you ask a Conscientious Style what time it is, s/he may explain how a clock works.
With Conscientious Styles, in general, be thorough, well-prepared, detail-oriented, business-like, and patient.
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style – Help Them
Influence – High “I” Style – Help Them
Steadiness – High “S” Style – Help Them
Conscientious – High “C” Style – Help Them
Use the following suggestions to help you adapt to other people’s behavioral styles when you are dealing with customers.
NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT:
Dominant Styles: What it does / By when / What it costs
Influence Styles: How it enhances their status and visibility
Steady Styles: How it will affect their personal circumstances
Conscientious Styles: How they can justify it logically / How it works
DO IT WITH:
Dominant Styles: Conviction
Influence Styles: Flair
Steady Styles: Warmth
Conscientious Styles: Accuracy
SAVE THEM:
Dominant Styles: Time
Influence Styles: Effort
Steady Styles: Conflict
Conscientious Styles: Embarrassment
TO FACILITATE DECISION-MAKING PROVIDE:
Dominant Styles: Options with supporting analysis
Influence Styles: Testimonials and incentives
Steady Styles: Personal service and assurances
Conscientious Styles: Data and documentation
LIKES YOU TO BE:
Dominant Styles: To the point
Influence Styles: Stimulating
Steady Styles: Pleasant
Conscientious Styles: Precise
SUPPORT THEIR:
Dominant Styles: Goals
Influence Styles: Ideas
Steady Styles: Feelings
Conscientious Styles: Procedures
CREATE THIS ENVIRONMENT:
Dominant Styles: Businesslike
Influence Styles: Enthusiastic
Steady Styles: Personal
Conscientious Styles: Serious
MAINTAIN THIS PACE:
Dominant Styles: Fast/decisive
Influence Styles: Fast/spontaneous
Steady Styles: Slow/relaxed
Conscientious Styles: Slow/systematic
FOCUS ON THIS PRIORITY:
Dominant Styles: The task/The results
Influence Styles: The relationship/Interaction
Steady Styles: The relationship/Communication
Conscientious Styles: The task/The process
AT PLAY BE:
Dominant Styles: Competitive and aggressive
Influence Styles: Spontaneous and playful
Steady Styles: Casual and cooperative
Conscientious Styles: Structured/Play by the rules
USE TIME TO:
Dominant Styles: Act efficiently
Influence Styles: Enjoy the interaction
Steady Styles: Develop the relationship
Conscientious Styles: Ensure accuracy
WRITE THIS WAY:
Dominant Styles: Short and to the point
Influence Styles: Informal and dramatic
Steady Styles: Warm and friendly
Conscientious Styles: Detailed and precise
ON THE TELEPHONE BE:
Dominant Styles: Short and to the point
Influence Styles: Conversational and playful
Steady Styles: Warm and pleasant
Conscientious Styles: Businesslike and precise
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style
Dominance – High “D” Style
Influence – High “I” Style
Steadiness – High “S” Style
Conscientious – High “C” Style